What Women Want: Suffrage, Gender Gaps in Voter Preferences and Government Expenditures

نویسندگان

  • Patricia Funk
  • Christina Gathmann
چکیده

This paper combines unique individual-level information on ballot votes with state-level data on expenditures to provide new evidence on how women suffrage has affected government spending. Using data from the last country in Europe to adopt suffrage, Switzerland, we demonstrate two main results. First, women suffrage has changed the scope of government much more than its size. Women are more likely to support expenditures for public goods like environment and public transport, but oppose defense spending and subsidies for agriculture. Second, the political gender gap has shifted over time. While women were equally likely than men to support publicly provided health and welfare services shortly after suffrage adoption, their demand for these services has increased over the past two decades. We calculate that ten years after women suffrage, total expenditures are around 7 percent lower than prior to adoption, while welfare expenditures are 10 percent higher.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

What women want: Su¤rage, female voter preferences and the scope of government*

How women su¤rage a¤ected the size of government is poorly understood. While aggregate data suggest that US states with su¤rage had higher expenditures than the ones without, individual data from elections describe women as more conservative during that period. This paper uses of a unique data set of issue votes to fully describe voter preferences and to directly estimate policy e¤ects. With su...

متن کامل

The Enfranchisement of Women and the Welfare State

The Enfranchisement of Women and the Welfare State We offer a rationale for the decision to extend the franchise to women within a politicoeconomic model where men are richer than women, women display a higher preference for public goods, and women’s disenfranchisement carries a societal cost. We first derive the tax rate chosen by the male median voter when women are disenfranchised. Next we s...

متن کامل

Why Can’t Women Win? Impediments to Female Electoral Success in Solomon Islands

Executive Summary This paper discusses impediments to female candidate success in national elections in the Western Melanesian country of Solomon Islands. Increased female representation in parliaments is desirable both for reasons of gender equity and because evidence suggests such increases come coupled with development benefits. Yet, while numbers of women members of parliament (MPs) are inc...

متن کامل

Estimating the E¤ect of Direct Democracy on Policy Outcomes: Preferences Matter!

Previous studies have found large negative e¤ects of direct democracies on government spending. Since they do not control for preference heterogeneity, these estimates su¤er from omitted variable bias. If citizens in areas with stronger direct democracy have lower tastes for government, the restraining e¤ect of institutions is overstated. Exploiting a unique dataset in Switzerland, we demonstra...

متن کامل

Men, Women, and the Ballot. Gender Imbalances and Suffrage Extensions in US States

Woman suffrage led to one of the greatest enfranchisements in history. Yet, women neither won the right to vote by force, nor did men grant it under the imminent threat of female unrest. These facts are difficult to reconcile with leading political economy theories of suffrage extensions. In this paper, we study suffrage extensions at the level of US states and territories in the late 19th and ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2006